From Report of the Citizens Commission, consisting of (the Late) Justice
S. M. Sikri, Badrud-Din Tyabji, ICS, Rajeshwar Dayal, IFS, Govind Narain,
ICS and TCA Srinivasavardan, IAS.
Case - 1
This widow, a former resident of Kartarnagar (trans-Yamuna area),
related that their house was looted and burnt by a mob on 2 November,
1984. Her husband and two sons, one married only four months ago, were
dragged out of the house and mercilessly beaten. Thereafter, kerosene
was poured over the three men and they were set alight. No police or
army was in evidence at the time. She could, she said, identify the
person who killed her husband. Though she did not know his name, she was
definite about the name of his father : a weaver of the area. She had
originally come from Rawalpindi at the time of Partition. This was her
second nightmarish experience of mob fury during which she had lost
everything, including three male members of her family.
She was accompanied by a completely dazed girl, hardly 16 years old,
widow of her recently-married and recently-butchered son. This young
girl sat through her mother-in-law's harrowing testimony shedding silent
tears of grief and despair.
Case - 2
According to this widow, mobs came to her neighbourhood at about 9 a.m.
on 1 November and began stoning Sikh houses in the vicinity. Sikhs who
happened to be out were advised by the police to return home and stay
indoors. They followed this advice and locked themselves inside their
homes. Soon after, the crowds returned and started breaking into
individual Sikh homes. The men were dragged out, beaten badly and burnt
alive. Then the houses were systematically looted and most of them set
on fire.
The Sikh residents of the area owned their homes. According to this
women's estimate there were approximately 35 to 40 Sikh homes in the
area, almost all of which had been destroyed and 55 men brutally
murdered. Only five men from the area survived, owing their escape to
their absence from home for one reason or another.
Case - 3: Burning Of Khalsa Middle School Sarojini Nagar
On the afternoon of 1 November, at about 3.30 or 4 p.m., a mob of about
250-300 men came to the school which has 525 pupils of whom 65% are
non-Sikhs. The mob first set fire to the tents and the school desks.
Thereafter, they demolished the boundary wall of the school. They then
entered the building and broke open the steel cupboards and looted them.
They stole the school typewriter, instruments belonging to the school
band, utensils, etc. Two desks and seven steel cupboards were seen being
taken away. They destroyed the library and scientific equipment in the
laboratory. The school building was burnt as also the Headmaster's
scooter.
There were seven or eight policemen standing by who witnessed the mob's
activities but did nothing to stop them. When asked to prevent the mob
from damaging the school, they said that they could do nothing. No
arrests are reported to have been made nor has any other action been
taken. The FIR was lodged on 7 or 8 November.
The Sikh SHO of the police station, located within sight of the school,
in understood to be a relative of a Congress-I leader. He is said to
have been beaten up on 31 October while in uniform, and was not to be
seen (he was either in hiding or under orders - the witness could not
say) from 31 October to 2 November.
It was further conveyed to the Commission that even though the school
imparts free education and is in receipt of a Government grant, no
repairs of any nature had begun as on 18 December 1984. Neither was any
furniture nor other equipment - not even books and stationery -
provided.
Case - 4
A social workers informed the Commission that he had been associated
with the Shakkarpur Camp as a voluntary relief worker since 6 November.
The camp had been set up on 3 November and the administration had
forcibly closed it on 13 November. When asked how it had been 'forcibly
closed' down, he replied that the water supply had been cut off. He then
asked the authorities how they would assist the inmates to return to
their original homes and was told that they would be returned in the
same way by which they had been brought to the camp.
Case - 5
A survivor from Mangolpuri, who had been operating his own
scooter-rickshaw in shifts jointly with his brother, had been brought to
a relief camp on 3 November by the army or CRP, he was not sure which.
He related that there was increasing tension on 31 October after the
news of the attack became known. He went to his neighbour for shelter
and was given protection but told to cut his hair, which he refused to
do. The following morning when a crowd came around, his neighbours asked
him to leave their house. Sikhs emerging on the street were seized and
their hair and beards were forcibly cut. The mob, who, he said, was from
the same locality, thereafter indulged in violence and looted individual
homes. However, the damage done was mainly to the woodwork. Some movable
property was stolen.
Very early on the following morning, at about 4 a.m, the crowd returned,
dragged the men out of their homes and beat them up. The neighbours
pleaded for their lives and they were thus saved but only for the time
being. In the evening the neighbours were also threatened with violence
and that silenced them. Then five persons of his family - his brother,
brother-in-law, uncle and two cousins - were belaboured with sticks and
rods and burnt alive. Attempts to rape some of the women were, however,
thwarted. The witness himself managed to escape by obtaining refuge in
the house of a Harijan woman.
On 3 November he was removed along with other survivors to a refugee
camp. He named seven persons amongst the perpetrators of the crimes, one
of whom was a local Congress-I worker identified as a supporter of a
former MP.
Case - 6
A woman from Trilokpuri described her harrowing experience. She and her
husband, a Lobana Sikh, originally from Sind, had migrated to Rajasthan
in 1947. About fifteen years ago they had moved to Delhi in search of
better prospects. During the slum clearance drive of 1974-75, they had
been resettled in Trilokpuri.
She and her husband and three of their children survive, but the eldest
son aged 18 was killed on 1 November.
She described the mob led by the Congress-I block pradhan as consisting
of some people from the same block and others from neighbouring blocks
and nearby villages. While the block pradhan identified Sikh houses and
urged the mobs to loot, burn and kill, the women were herded together
into one room. Some of them ran away but were pursued to the nearby
nallah where they were raped. Their shrieks and cries for help fell on
deaf ears. From among the women held in the room, the hoodlums asked
each other to select whomsoever they chose. All the women were stripped
and many dishonoured. She herself was raped by ten men. Their lust
satisfied, they told the women to get out, naked as they were. For fear
of their lives they did so, hiding their shame as best as possible. Each
begged or borrowed a garment from relenting neighbours and sought
shelter wherever they could.
Case - 7
The Commission gathered the following facts at the Sadar Bazar gurdwara
(Delhi Cantonment).
Having heard of the news of the assassination, one witness feared
trouble and brought his family to the gurdwara. He found that some other
families had already collected there. Leaving the women and children
downstairs, the men went up to the roof from where they saw a crowd
collecting at the local Congress-I office about 200 yards away. They had
come by truck at 8.30 on morning of 1 November.
The mob then advanced towards the gurdwara and started stoning the
people they saw on the roof. The Sikhs had also collected some bricks
which they threw at the crowd. When their supply was exhausted, the mob
became emboldened and set fire to a shop which the gurdwara had rented
out. The group of Sikhs, about twelve in number, collected all the
swords available with them in the gurdwara and came out. The mob
retreated in the face of this puny show of force. The police, who had
been informed, came at about 3.30 p.m. By that time, the fire had been
put out. The police surprisingly expressed their inability to do
anything further to help them. Consequently the Sikhs went back inside
and locked the iron gates of the gurdwara.
On 2 November, the army brought refugees from other colonies in the area
surrounding Palam until there were 2,000 refugees in the gurdwara. They
were housed, clothed and fed entirely by voluntary effort. The gurdwara
itself fortunately escaped damage.
Case - 8
This victim's family consisted of his father, four brothers, mother, two
sisters-in-law, his wife and children. The family owned a bakery, a
confectionery, a kirana shop and a small chemical industry.
On 1 November at about 11 a.m., a mob of some four hundred attacked the
shop and the factory. The father and the four brothers came out and
pleaded with them. Some local Congress-I workers arranged a compromise
and asked them all to go back. Eight persons from the mob, who were
looting inside the shops, also came out and went away.
Fifteen minutes later, a bigger mob of about two thousand came and burnt
the shops and the factory.
One of the local Congress-I workers had a fair price shop in his name
which, because of the complaints of the residents, had been cancelled
and allotted to this family. That seemed to be the bone of contention.
The victim's house had the symbol 'Om' on the front and could not be
identified as Sikh house unless it had been pointed out as such by a
local person.
The victim's father, three brothers and sister-in-law were beaten and
set on fire. Some liquid chemical and a powder were used as incendiary
material.
The victim himself escaped by hiding in the neighbouring house of a Jat
friend. He cut his hair and went to Palam airport from where he returned
to the gurdwara on the 4th. There was no help from the police. There was
no electricity in the locality (Sadh Nagar) for 72 hours. Army rescue
work started on 3 November.
The victim, who is a young man, is left with his widowed mother, widowed
sister-in-law, brother's children and his own family to look after. He
is not prepared to go back to his original home, which he considers
unsafe, but is ready to settle down in Delhi in a safe area and to
re-establish his bakery. He has already applied for a bank loan.
The mob leader has been identified as a local Congress-I worker, who is
said to be the right hand man of a former M.P.
Case - 9
What follows is a summary of an eye-witness account sent to the
Commission by a practicing Chartered Accountant (a non-Sikh) living in
New Friends? Colony. His account beings:
"Delhi had been considered by us to be a civilized city. The news of
rioting coming from different parts of the country from time to time had
always carried an aura of remoteness - something which could not happen
in Delhi. Or so it seemed up to 30 October recently."
He continues to relate that, after the announcement of Smt. Gandhi?s
death over the AIR, they began receiving telephone calls from friends
informing them of incidents in various parts of the city - from Jorbagh,
from Ring Road, from Safdarjung Enclave - of Sikhs being badly beaten up
and otherwise harassed. In view of the trouble, he and a friend decided
to go to the airport later that night to receive a Sikh friend arriving
in Delhi. On their way back they saw a car burning near the IIT on outer
Ring Road. Then they saw a bus on fire. A little further on, they saw
five taxis ablaze at a taxi stand. It was about midnight by now and,
after dropping their friend at Panchsheel Enclave, they encountered
several more burning vehicles and shards of glass from broken
wind-screens littering the road. They saw only two policemen on the way
home. Both of them were unarmed. One of them was hurling stones at the
Sikhs along with the crowd. The other was urging people in the crowd to
join in the attacks.
The crowd was armed with lathis, crow-bars and iron rods. They did not
see any firearms, either with the crowd or with the beleaguered Sikhs.
In New Friends? Colony, they saw several Sikh-owned shops which had been
set on fire.
Intervening shops belonging to Hindus had not been touched.
Two trucks parked nearby were set on fire. The crowd then invaded the
gurdwara opposite the shops. They ransacked the rooms in the gurdwara
compound and set fire to the buildings.
Efforts to contact the police on the telephone were in fructuous. He saw
no signs of a police presence, much less intervention. The absence of
the police, according to him, emboldened the mob. He felt that the
?scenes of wild mourning and mass popular anger on the television were
not helping in calming the fury of the mob?
That afternoon he saw another mob looting a house in a cool and
unhurried manner, without any dispute or competition among the looters.
Within half-an-hour, the house had been completely ransacked and then
set on fire.
At about 4 pm, while the looting was going on, the siren of an
approaching police vehicle was heard. This alarmed the mob who began to
disperse but the vehicle just drove by and the crowd re-assembled.
Case - 10
A 75 year old army officer, having retired in 1958, narrated that a mob
consisting mostly of some DTC bus drivers from Hari Nagar Depot
accompanied by anti-social elements attacked some shops and nearby
houses in 'G' Block of Hari Nagar. Arson followed the looting. Cars,
private buses, trucks and scooters parked in that area were also burnt.
The Sikh residents, assisted by Hindu neighbours of Fateh Nagar and Shiv
Nagar, came out and succeeded in challenging the miscreants and driving
them away.
On 3 November, at midday, the SHO of Tilak Nagar Police Station turned
up in a jeep and asked the people to go indoors. Given the previous
dab's experience, the residents did not trust the police and some of
them continued to maintain a vigil in the streets. Seeing this, the
police officer sent some constables to the army officers house. They
began abusing and beating his family members and even threatened one of
them with a gun. They also beat this 75-year old man and confiscated his
unloaded licensed revolver which he had owned since 1944. They dragged
him by his hair to the jeep and took him to the Police Station,
continuing to hit him with the butts of their guns. He was told to kill
two Sikhs if he wanted to be freed.
At the Police Station he was locked up and again beaten to the point of
bleeding and becoming unconscious. He was beaten by a Sub-inspector
(whom he named) who shouted that no Sikh would be able to live in the
area with his hair and beard. Among the four police personnel who had
beaten him, he named two--an Sl and an ASI. The following day, the
police took him to Court where a case under Section 307 of the IPC was
registered against him. He was locked up in Tihar Jail along with some
criminals and was able to secure his release on bail only on 12
November.
Case - 11
The late husband of this witness was a tea-stall owner. They are
originally from Alwar. They were resettled in Trilokpuri in 1977, on a
plot measuring 22.5 sq. yds., and given a loan of Rs. 2,000 to build a
dwelling.
Her husband and three sons (the eldest aged 28, was a railway porter,
the second aged 20, drove a hired scooter-rickshaw while the third was a
boy of 14), were all killed on 1 November.
She said that on 1 November, some people went around asking the shops to
down shutters. Those who had closed them, returned to their homes. She
then said that the pradhan (Congress-l) of their block went around
calling people to assemble, as a mob was coming to burn the gurdwara.
The police soon came on the scene and warned them all to return to their
homes and to stay indoors assuring them that they would be safe if they
did so. When a mob first came the Sikhs came out and repulsed them.
Three such waves were repulsed but each time the police came and told
them to go home and stay there.
The fourth time the mob came in increased strength and started attacking
individual homes, driving people out, beating and burning them and
setting fire to their homes. The method of killing was invariably the
same: a man was hit on the head, sometimes his skull broken, kerosene
poured over him and set on fire. Before being burnt, some had their eyes
gouged out. Sometimes, when a burning man asked for water, a man
urinated on his mouth.
Several individuals, including her sister's son tried to escape by
cutting their hair. Most of them were also killed. Some had their hair
forcibly cut but were nevertheless killed thereafter.
She lost everything of value from her own home, including Rs. 7,000 in
cash, a radio, a TV and other items. Despite being a middle-aged mother
of four, she was nearly raped but was saved by providence. Nevertheless
she was repeatedly humiliated and her clothes were torn off two or three
times. She said that when the stricken women rushed out of their burning
homes, the Gujjars (from village Chilla), bhangis and some others
inquired from each other which woman they fancied and then proceeded to
rape them. She heard people shouting to each other to kill every Sikh
and that even if one escaped, it would be bad for them.
There were twenty one males in her father-in-law's family. All of them
were killed. Her brother was beaten and left for dead but fortunately
survived.
Case - 12
This resident of Nangloi, a venerable person with a flowing white beard
who looked like a patriarch, belonged originally to Rawalpindi. He had
previously lost everything during Partition.
He informed the Commission that on 1 November at about 1:00 pm, many
trucks and tractors with trolleys full of stones came to Nangloi from
the direction of Bahadurgarh. This happened at a time when the Delhi/Haryana
border was said to have been sealed. The drivers and passengers let
loose a region of terror in the area. They first stoned the houses, then
broke open and looted them, and finally dragged out the men and killed
them. He said that 65 male Sikhs had been killed in Nangloi. Only the
women, two old men and small children survived. In addition to stones,
the mob carried studded rods, kerosene and some inflammable powder. He
alleged that a political leader came on a motorcycle and identified the
houses inhabited by Sikhs. Asked how he recognized the motorcyclist he
replied that he knew him personally, having gone to him for help in
solving personal problems.
FlRs had been lodged on 4 and 5 November but so far no action had been
taken nor any arrests made. No stolen goods had been recovered. Asked
whether any women had been molested, he replied emphatically in the
negative.
He also said that trains between Rohtak and Delhi had been stopped at
Nangloi and Sikh passengers dragged out, beaten and murdered.
Case - 13
A retired Deputy Director of Animal Husbandry, Delhi State, this witness
lives on a small farm on the southern outskirts of the capital. He
appeared before the Commission at his own request. He grows vegetables,
breeds chicken and maintains some cattle. He also renders free
veterinary services to the residents of surrounding villages who
frequently come to consult him regarding problems concerning their
live-stock.
He related that once the news of the assassination became widely known,
feelings were aroused as a matter of course. He saw groups of people
moving around and going to Sikh residences in the area which were
attacked and looted. Some chickens and a buffalo were stolen from his
farm and some damage inflicted on the main building. He was not
interested in going into details and declared that he did not want any
compensation for himself. Nor had he any particular complaint against
the miscreants whom, he felt, had been put up to their misdeeds.
He told the Commission in as many words that his major concern was for
the future. What, he asked concisely, was in store for the country when
anti-social forces were enabled, or were able, to perpetrate misdeeds or
to break the law with impunity. He said that this was his sole concern
and that he had sought an interview with the Commission only to request
it to devise measures to ensure the future of the country.
Case - 14
A serving army NCO made available to the Commission a copy of a letter
he had sent to his superior officer. He was returning to Delhi from
Amritsar on the Frontier Mail on 2 November 1984, after availing of five
days' casual leave. He states that he was witness to the stopping of
trains on the approach to Delhi across the Yamuna when Sikh passengers,
including some Sikh soldiers, were beaten and/or killed. After being
beaten, some were thrown into the river while others were roasted alive.
A few were able to save their lives after they had shaved or cut their
hair. He also saw the heads and beards of dead Sikhs being shaved after
which kerosene was poured over their faces and set alight so that the
dead person could not be identified. After about two hours, a guard over
a treasury consignment fired three shots in the air which caused the mob
to scatter and the train then moved off. Upon reaching Delhi Main
Station, he says that he saw many bodies of dead Sikhs. He reported-his
experience to the RTO at Delhi station.
He wrote that he himself was spared because he was in uniform and that
the mob told him that they were letting him off for that reason.
Case - 15
On 21 December three members of the Commission visited Sultanpuri and
Mangolpuri. They inspected the damaged houses and saw the terrible havoc
that had been wreaked. The tales of violence were broadly similar to
other accounts they had heard. The new item was that they were told that
the police had fired on Sikhs who had grouped in the street for
self-defence. They named a police officer who allegedly fired on the
group and killed two men. The marks of .303 rifle bullets on some houses
were pointed out to the members. A spent bullet was found embedded in a
wall. This police officer was still posted in Sultanpuri Police Station
and continued to threaten and abuse Sikh residents.
The Commission was given several names of miscreants amongst whom was a
kerosene depot holder, who was said to have supplied free kerosene oil.
The others named were the block pradhan (Congress-I), another oil dealer
and a Congress-I worker described as a special confidant of a prominent
Congress-I leader.
The local perpetrators of the violence continue to threaten and
intimidate the remaining residents, almost all of whom at that time were
women and children. Nearly all the men had gone to Rajasthan and were
planning to stay there till at least after the elections. The Commission
was told of the harassment of a Muslim resident of the area, who had
given protection and assistance to the Sikhs for which he had been
beaten up. He was threatened, even as late as on 12 December, for
continuing to give them advice and assistance.
Case - 16
This victim, originally from Alwar, has resided in Delhi for about 25
years. In 1977, he had been moved along with others to Block 32,
Trilokpuri. He operated his own cycle-rickshaw and owned a pucca house
consisting of two rooms.
He told the Commission that out of the nine male members in his family,
seven had been killed. Only he and one brother survive. The gist of his
gruesome experience is as follows:
The killings took place on the afternoon of 1 November. The usual method
was to make the victims immobile by beating them. Then kerosene was
poured over them and they were set on fire. He mentioned that, earlier,
a police havildar, whom he named, and two constables had come to the
area and when they saw a group of Sikhs gathered to defend themselves,
the havildar shot and killed one of them. He named three local political
figures as having been leaders of the aggressive mob. When the Sikhs
grouped, the mob dispersed. But the police persuaded them to return to
their respective homes. When they returned and locked themselves in, the
mobs came again and meted out broadly similar treatment to each house.
They first knocked at the door asking the inmates to come out. If they
did not, the door was broken open and the inmates were dragged out. If
they opened the door, they got the same treatment. They were first
beaten, and sometimes knocked senseless, thereafter kerosene was poured
over the individual who was then set alight. In almost all cases, the
neighbors did not help. Rather, they participated in the violence. He
said that four types of cases had been registered: assault and robbery,
rape, arson and murder. There had been no action so far; a few culprits
who had been arrested were released within a few days and were still at
large and threatening the people. No efforts had been made to recover
stolen property and none had been returned to the owners.
He also alleged that bank officials and/or civil servants had indulged
in fraud or mischief while distributing the cheques covering the
compensation stipulated by the Government.
Case - 17
This witness is a raagi (performer of kirtan) employed by the Delhi
Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee. He informed the Commission that, being on
duty that morning at one of the gurdwaras, he left home at about 7 am on
1 November and disembarked from a bus at Punjabi Bagh to catch a
connecting bus. He was seized by the crowd and roughed up. His hair was
forcibly cut but he managed to escape. He returned to his house,
collected his family and managed to reach safety. It took him some time
to round them up. During this time he saw the local dealer in kerosene
oil and a local Congress-l leader supplying free kerosene to the crowd.
He saw a woman who was five months pregnant being dragged into a house.
She did not emerge for a considerable time.
They were taken to a relief camp on 3 November. FlRs were lodged on 4 or
5 November but no action had been taken. The same people who brutalized
them continue to threaten them and joke about the Sikhs. Asked how he
knew that the perpetrators were Congress-l men, he replied that they
were all shouting slogans such as 'Indira Gandhi Zindabad' and 'Sajjan
Kumar Zindabad'.
Case - 18
During its visit to S.S. Mota Singh School Camp, Narang Colony, the
Commission heard a general account from the President and Secretary of
the local Cooperative House building Society. The general pattern of
violence was described as follows.
A group of urchins, led and encouraged by some adults, were collected
and supplied with free liquor, iron rods, kerosene or petrol. They then
went on a rampage beating individuals, of whom some were burnt. Only
Sikh houses were burnt--and these were identified by one of the leaders.
Those who escaped and went to the police for assistance were ignored or,
worse, ill-treated by the police themselves. Such police personnel were
known to have instigated killings for fear of being identified by the
victims.
A typical police report would read somewhat as follows: 'A small group
was gathered at a point when they were faced by a large number of Sikhs
with kirpans. Feeling threatened they began attacking Sikhs.'
No searches were made to recover stolen property. The police only went
around the residential areas appealing to persons to surrender stolen
goods. While some items were recovered in this manner, not even 10% of
them had been returned to the legitimate owners.
In the Janakpuri area, fourteen gurdwaras were burnt. The building of S.
S. Mota Singh School had been burnt and the metal door destroyed --and
the local police station is only 250 metres away. At a nearby school,
the building and eleven buses had been burnt. Attempts to get police
intervention were in fructuous.
Several people had seen a prominent Congress-l politician's
brother-in-law advising or instigating the mobs. They also saw young men
coming to the crowd on motorcycles, presumably to convey instructions or
give guidance.
The residents of the area were upset with the Congress-l whose
representatives, they firmly believed, were responsible for the
violence. They were even more upset that after the violence no
representatives of either the Congress-l or representatives of any other
political party came to sympathize with them or give them any relief. |